Each developer gets a defined delivery process and an account-scoped record of decisions, findings, evidence, and open work. The next session resumes from recorded state instead of reconstructing it.
Every reconstruction of architecture, conventions, and settled decisions consumes engineering time. Loam loads a bounded working set from the account-scoped record before the first prompt, reducing repeated briefing while keeping older detail available through recall.
In one dated internal case, the first cold review surfaced around 110 findings across roughly 150,000 lines and drove each to a terminal state. Later passes read that ledger before reviewing the new delta. Across sixty recorded passes, none of the original findings had to be re-derived. This is internal evidence from Loam's own codebase, not a universal benchmark.
The session opens with recorded state, evidence comes before theories, decisions are written down, and code is reviewed before handoff. The process is visible and repeatable across accounts.
Security and IT pages separate what is stored, encrypted, queryable, account-isolated, deletable, and still on the roadmap. Review the boundary directly rather than inferring it from product copy.
Today, Loam's memory is per-account and isolated. Each engineer's team remembers that engineer's projects — architecture decisions, corrections, review history — and nothing crosses accounts. That isolation is a feature: your code never becomes another account's context.
On the roadmapA future version of Loam will support organizational accounts, where memory is institutional and shared across your team. That model is in development and does not exist today — every memory is currently per-account. See exactly what's stored →
Track time-to-resume, accepted output, terminal review findings, rework, and the quality of the handoff evidence.